[c-nsp] Bug CSCeh27672 (EoMPLS MTU enhancements)

[Rodney Dunn]

I'll ask and see what I can find out for ya.

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 07:42:47PM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
>  
> It would be most useful to us in 7200 code right now...
> (we are unlikely to trunk on 7600)
> 
> Dave.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Dickinson
> To: Rodney Dunn
> Cc: David Freedman; 'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net'
> Sent: 24/09/07 19:41
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Bug CSCeh27672 (EoMPLS MTU enhancements)
> 
> Rodney Dunn wrote:
> > It's not in any shipping code yet.
> > 
> > I happened to check it today as I'm in a Carrier Ethernet Services
> class.
> > 
> > There is a request in to port the changes to SRA and SRB throttle.
> > 
> > No clue yet where they will allow them to go yet.
> >
> > Rodney
> 
> Thanks for this Rodney.
> 
> Although I really want this as described, I want this backporting to
> 12.2SB
> (or 12.2SRC depending on what happens there) and 12.0S, to be able to
> really
> rely on it, ie 7200/7301/GSR as well as 7600.  Any updates on target
> releases
> for this would be greatly appreciated.
> 
> Ian
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 02:00:24AM +0100, David Freedman wrote:
> > 
> >>Appears to now be "resolved", does anybody know what feature name this
> >>became, or where I can find it?
> >>
> >>I'm looking at being able to modify VLAN based EoMPLS attachment
> circuit
> >>"perceived" MTU such to be able to fool an EoMPLS pseudowire into
> being able
> >>to come up (to pass RFC4447 MTU check) when trunk (main) interface is
> of a
> >>higher MTU on the local router than on the remote.
> >>
> >>Kind Regards,
> >>
> >>David Freedman
> 
> -- 
> Ian Dickinson
> Senior Network Development Engineer
> Pipex Communications
> ian.dickinson at pipex.net
> http://www.pipex.net
> 
> This e-mail is subject to: http://www.pipex.net/disclaimer.html