[c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series)

[Brandon Price]

Netscreen 5400

15x the 3des performance, 2.5x number of tunnels and SUB 1 second
stateful failover arent compelling enough reasons? 

Brandon

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 6:15 AM
To: Masood Ahmad Shah
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series)

Hi,
> If you really need a firewall thn you must go for Netscreen. Netscreen

> is a truly firewall with pretty nice/stable packet inspection engine 
> and pretty nice GUI/Command line interface.

even against ASA 5580-40 ? can someone point me to a compelling reason
to think of a netscreen instead of such a box? 

alan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/