[c-nsp] Router down - What is "Net Background"?
Justin Shore
justin at justinshore.com
Fri Apr 4 16:01:54 EDT 2008
The problem turned out to be a bad NM-1A-OC3SMI. I scrounged up a spare
and replaced it and resolved the issue. The bouncing circuit was
definitely the problem. Even with all the sub-ints admin down the
bouncing of the OC3 itself was enough to make the 3660 waiver. I can
only imagine what it would have been like if I hadn't had the sub-ints
down. Actually, I guess I don't have to try and imagine it; it happened
this AM.
The router did actually crash. 3 times this AM. I have 3 crash logs to
work with. I'm going to use them to RMA the NM with TAC.
All is well right now. I'm surprised at how painful an OC3 state change
can be. I don't recall ever having that kind of drain on the resources
when working with them before. It's something to remember though.
Thanks for all the info,
Justin
e ninja wrote:
> Justin,
>
> What do you mean by "die"? A crash is not the same thing as a hang. Did
> your 3660 crash or hang? If the former, IOS should dump a crashinfo file
> - if you have one, lets take a look at it. If the latter, take a look at;
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps359/products_tech_note09186a0080106fd7.shtml
>
> /eninja
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 7:42 AM, Justin Shore <justin at justinshore.com
> <mailto:justin at justinshore.com>> wrote:
>
> I just had a 3660 terminating about 1500 PVCs for DSL die this AM. The
> 3660 is running 12.3(22) w/ 256MB of RAM. I'm at the remote POP now,
> consoled in and looking at the box. The console hangs for 45-60s before
> I get a chance to run a quick command or two. Then it goes back to the
> hung state about 5 seconds later. The box keeps dropping my 2 OC3s and
> bouncing my IS-IS processes. Syslog didn't appear to capture anything
> interesting leading up to this crash. I had the box power cycled while
> I was driving down here.
>
> Overall the CPU is low and neither CPU nor memory were being taxed over
> the past number of months. The Net Background process is using a fair
> bit of the processor. Actually, that's an understatement. At times
> it's only using 9% or so. At other times it's up to 97% as was the case
> here:
>
> 3660-2.brd#sh proc cpu sort 5m
> CPU utilization for five seconds: 1%/0%; one minute: 17%; five
> minutes: 19%
> PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
> 28 4715940 611 7731049 97.09% 13.74% 9.23% 0 Net
> Background
> 31 238608 865 275847 2.65% 8.58% 8.48% 0
> Per-Second Jobs
> 5 8336 684 12187 0.00% 0.56% 0.68% 0 Check
> heaps
> 60 7764 7776 998 0.01% 0.27% 0.43% 0 IP Input
>
> 18 3856 8741 441 0.00% 0.42% 0.33% 0 ARP
> Input
> 167 2556 3046 839 0.02% 0.12% 0.13% 0 ISIS Upd
>
> 140 2732 15 182133 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0 Key Proc
>
> 179 1680 1676 1002 0.00% 0.13% 0.11% 0 OSPF
> Router
> 47 1912 152 12578 0.00% 0.12% 0.11% 0
> Per-minute Jobs
> 82 1792 597 3001 0.01% 0.15% 0.11% 0 IP
> Background
> 3 1828 238 7680 0.00% 0.11% 0.09% 0 OSPF
> Hello
> 100 644 1217 529 0.00% 0.13% 0.08% 0 DHCPD
> Receive
> 51 1700 376 4521 0.00% 0.04% 0.05% 0 ATM
> Periodic
> 83 700 417 1678 0.00% 0.01% 0.02% 0 IP RIB
> Update
> 108 500 871 574 0.00% 0.06% 0.02% 0 CEF
> process
> 124 172 471 365 0.00% 0.04% 0.02% 0 Exec
>
> 166 620 1908 324 0.00% 0.03% 0.02% 0 ISIS Adj
>
> 106 420 284 1478 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% 0 Adj
> Manager
> 6 436 1406 310 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% 0 Pool
> Manager
> 91 188 556 338 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0 ILMI
> Timer Proce
> 163 92 1795 51 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0 CLNS
> Input
>
>
> Per-Second Jobs is also using quite a bit of CPU. The log has CPUHOG
> entries in it pointing at the Net Background process too:
>
> 000428: .Apr 4 08:36:31 CDT: %SYS-3-CPUHOG: Task ran for 50332 msec
> (10/0), process = Net Background, PC = 60439FFC.
> -Traceback= 6043A004
>
> What does the Net Background process do? I haven't been able to find
> any answers on Cisco.com.
>
>
> We're in the middle of SmartNet renewals and negotiations and
> unfortunately this box's contract has expired. I can have our AM bless
> a TAC case for us if need be, assuming I can locate him; I think he's in
> training this week back East.
>
> Any ideas? I'm going to go back and scrutinize the log for anything
> useful. As of right now the box is intermittently pingable,
> corresponding directly to the brief instances that I can use the
> console. Customer packets seem to flow about as well.
>
> Thanks
> Justin
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> <mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Forget previous vote
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list