[c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series)

[Gregori Parker]

As does the ASA 5520..

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Murphy, William 
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 3:31 PM
To: A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk; Brandon Price
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series)

Checkpoint also does stateful failover...

Bill Murphy
Senior Network Analyst
University of Texas Health Science Center - Houston


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 5:05 PM
To: Brandon Price
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Check Point v Cisco PIX (ASA 5500 Series)

Hi,

> Netscreen 5400
> 
> 15x the 3des performance, 2.5x number of tunnels and SUB 1 second
> stateful failover arent compelling enough reasons? 

i dont do VPN termination on firewalls. the stateful failover
is a point though

alan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/