[c-nsp] 6500 vs. 7600 revisited again (was: CSM for service providers)

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:29:55PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Alternatively, if it's not at all too impossible, Cisco 
> could craft a daughter -3CXL card for the SUP720-3BXL so we 
> can get -3CXL functionality with a simple supervisor module 
> PFC upgrade.

As in "-3BXL upgrade for the Sup32"?

Cisco could, of course, but that would mean "less sales of new modules
and completely new devices", so why should they do that?  "customer
happiness"?

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080409/cd955327/attachment.bin