[c-nsp] MPLS L3 VPN. How much longer?

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday 16 April 2008, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:

> L2 point to point (Martini tunnel and similar) is okay.
> VPLS, not a chance.

Agree... L2VPN's are great especially if your customers are 
clued.

VPLS still has a lot more maturing to do, we think. We are 
approaching it cautiously, but see a lot more l2circuits 
going up in comparison to VPLS.

> Give me L3 VPN any day of the week. 

We recommend L2VPN's as much as possible - cheaper for and 
the customer especially if they prefer to handle their own 
routing.

We still support L3VPN's.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080416/8cf7a2e1/attachment-0001.bin