[c-nsp] 6500 Netflow

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Apr 18 08:55:21 EDT 2008


Hi,

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:39:53AM -0400, Tim Durack wrote:
> Sounds like an argument for doing something stateless like sFlow for
> statistics instead of flogging the NetFlow horse.

This very much depends on your needs.  If you need detailed records for
billing purposes, sFlow (or sampled NetFlow) is just not good enough.

For basic "what's going on?" detection, sflow/sampled netflow is fine.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080418/5190bbb0/attachment.bin 


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list