[c-nsp] eBGP square vs triangles?

[Andy Taylor]

Hi,

I decided to deploy having both edge routers in AS1 eBGP peer with both edge
routers in AS2 and iBGP between them locally as it gave greater redundancy
and faster convergence.

Physically I have two edge routers in AS1 and two edge routers in AS2, I had
the opportunity to connect them any way I want to.

All the very best,

Andy


On 22/04/2008 23:35, "cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:33:59 -0700
> From: dpinkard at AccessLine.com
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] eBGP square vs triangles?
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
> <C7F9DF38B33FA44E85FBD1757447D48A358F614E at mail.accessline.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain
> 
> So what did you decide, Andy?
> 
> What are your greater concerns? Router failure? Link failure? How are all 4
> connected without respect to BGP? In general, I'd just follow the physical
> topology unless there's a reason not to.
>