[c-nsp] Qos between CE and PE

[Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)]

Alex,

if you use the MQC "percent" keyword, make sure you set your interface
bandwidth accordingly. What does "show policy-map interface" tell you
about the bandwidth for the class you've used?
I wouldn't use priority queue for this, "bandwidth" (as used on the
"PE") is just fine for this.

	oli

alex at alsn.be <> wrote on Friday, April 25, 2008 1:28 PM:

> Hello,
> 
> I tried to enable Qos between to routers. I checked configurations on
> several sites but didn't get it to work.
> 
> here are the relevant parts of the configs:
> 
> On the CE router:
> 
> class-map match-all FTP-server
>  match access-group 110
> !
> policy-map FTP
>  class FTP-server
>   priority percent 75
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet0/0
>  ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.0
>  service-policy output FTP
>  duplex auto
>  speed 10
> !
> access-list 110 permit ip any host 192.168.3.10
> 
> On the PE router:
> 
> class-map match-all FTP-server
>  match access-group 110
> !
> policy-map FTP
>   class FTP-server
>     bandwidth percent 75
> !
> interface GigabitEthernet0/1
>  ip address 192.168.100.2 255.255.255.0
>  duplex auto
>  speed 10
>  media-type rj45
>  no negotiation auto
>  service-policy output FTP
> !
> access-list 110 permit ip host 192.168.3.10 any
> 
> I have one host on the CE and two hosts on PE. 192.168.3.10 is a FTP
> server that should get 75% bandwith. On the other host i run Iperf to
> use the bandwidth.
> 
> When i start a ftp connection and then the Iperf (or the other way
> around) The ftp drops to 50kbs.
> 
> 
> Any idea how to stay around 750kbs on the ftp connection?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/