[c-nsp] Spanning VRFs and seeing my own MAC address on a 4948
Sam Stickland
sam_mailinglists at spacething.org
Tue Aug 5 07:21:31 EDT 2008
Phil Mayers wrote:
> Sam Stickland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have a pair of 4948s and some DDOS devices configured in this
>> topology (this is an inheritated design btw!):
>>
>> SW1 SVI ---VLANA-- SW2 SVI
>> | |
>> DDOS Std DDOS Act
>> | |
>> SW1 (L2) --VLANB-- SW2 (L2)
>> X |
>> | |
>> Inside ----VLANB--- Inside
>>
>> The Standby DDOS device does not pass traffic, but VLANs A and B are
>> effectively bridged by the Active DDOS device on the right.
>
> What is a DDOS device? Do you mean IDS/IPS?
Yup.
>>
>> The SVIs on SW1 and SW2 are in a seperate "outside" VRF, and they
>> provide a HSRP address that the inside network has a default pointing
>> towards.
>>
>> The CPU on the active side (SW2) is pegged at 99% and it's all in
>> host learning. The log buffer reports:
>>
>> Aug 5 07:44:34.467 UTC: %C4K_L2MAN-5-ROUTERMACADDRESSRXASSOURCE:
>> (Suppressed 61591949 times)Packet received with my own MAC address
>> (X:X:X:X:X:X) as source on port Gix/y in vlan B
>>
>> (Gix/y connects to the inside port on the DDOS appliance).
>>
>> I believe this is because the switches MAC tables aren't VRF aware and
>
> MAC tables aren't VRF aware. They only need to be VLAN-aware.
>
I'm aware of this, I was just stating my reasoning in a perhaps not to
clear way :)
> Frankly I'm surprised this isn't working; if the SW2(L2) are really at
> layer2 with no SVI, and no L2 control protocols passing the DDoS
> device e.g. spanning tree, CDP, LLDP etc.
The have no SVI, but spanning-tree instances are running for VLANs A and B.
>
>> the only way to solve the CPU problem is to use physically seperate
>> switches: i.e. replace the L2 portions in the diagram with separate
>> L2 switches.
>
> You could try changing the MAC address of the SVI e.g. to a locally
> assigned one:
>
> int VlanX
> mac-address H.H.H
>
> ...I'm not familiar with the C4k platform, but it's common that
> devices have a finite number of MAC addresses they can use. Also when
> I tried it on our 6500s I had problems where it didn't pick up the MAC
> change on an existing SVI until reboot, but would on a newly-created SVI.
Unfortunately the C4k platform doesn't support changing the BIA
addresses, but given the nature of the error I don't think it would
help. I think it's caused by the layer 2 portion of the switches seeing
traffic sourced from it's own SVI on ones it's ports, which is confusing
the host learning.
Sam
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list