[c-nsp] Route Leaking and next-hop recursion
Sami Joseph
sami.joseph at gmail.com
Thu Aug 7 17:59:19 EDT 2008
Hi All,
I need to reinforce my understanding of how route leaking from a VRF to
global works, I was not able to find a decent document using Google.
Network topology:
http://www.postyourimage.com/view_image.php?img_id=GpgBT3FzVRxuuE81218144855
On the 6500 switch, I created Vlans and SVIs like the following:
*interface Vlan20*
*ip address 10.5.5.73 255.255.255.248*
And on interface vlan 40, I added a VRF
*int vlan40*
*ip vrf forwarding 3G*
*ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252*
Then I want the routes inside this VRF to access the IP addresses behind
VLAN20 as depicted in the diagram : (1.1.1.10 and 1.1.1.11)
So I need to do leaking from global to vrf and the path back from vrf to
global:
*ip route vrf 3G 1.1.1.10 255.255.255.255 10.5.5.74 global*
And: (assuming the networks on the yellow cloud are 8.8.8.0)
*ip route 8.8.8.0 255.255.255.0 vlan40*
This way, I guaranteed that packets destined from the VRF to global will go
to their next-hop which is directly connected to the switch (10.5.5.74) and
I suppose route recursion should be able to find where the next-hop is.
When we opened a ticket for this, we were told that with this setup, CEF is
not going to be able to create a valid adjacency and so an arp request will
be sent for each packet destined to 10.5.5.74 without a reply.
Why cant CEF install an entry for 10.5.5.74, why cant route recursion work?
Thanks,
Sam
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list