[c-nsp] Route Leaking and next-hop recursion

[Peter Rathlev]

On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 14:26 +0300, Sami Joseph wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:05 AM, <peter at rathlev.dk> wrote
> > Just a shot in the dark, but would it help to add an interface to
> > the vrf route statement? Like this:
> >
> > ip route vrf 3G 1.1.1.10 255.255.255.255 Vlan20 10.5.5.74 global
>
> That made it work but i need to understand the reason?

Well, I guess CEF needs all the relevant information (next hop IP +
interface) to build a full adjacency, and not just a glean adjacency.

I can't figure out why the glean wouldn't work, i.e. why there would
never be any response to the ARP for 10.5.5.74. I guess CEF has some
voodoo elements. :-)

Regards,
Peter


>         
> 
>