[c-nsp] Fwd: Alternantive to REB(route bridge Encapsulation)-2nd try

[Hash Aminu]

Hi Gert,T
Thank you for the response, we are moving to 12.0S (7500 router to have a
L2VPN support which is not supported on the 12.4T that supports the RBE). I
just checked the cisco FN and Classical bridging is not supported on the "S"
train. Any more inputs will be appreciated.

Thanks

Hash

On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 06:09:56PM +0300, Hash Aminu wrote:
> > I am trying to find a Feature that will be able to replace Route bridge
> > Encapsulation..because we are migrating to the 12.2S and does not support
> > that feature..any thoughts or Ideas will be useful. Thanks
>
> Makes me wonder why you would want to migrate to a dead IOS train that
> doesn't deliver what you want...
>
> But if you insist on feeling the pain, the alternative to RBE is
> "classical"
> ATM bridging - setup a BVI interface, a bridge-group, and put the ATM VC
> into the bridge group.  Nasty, does not scale well (maximum of 255 bridge-
> groups), and much more convoluted configuration.
>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                           //
> www.muc.de/~gert/ <http://www.muc.de/%7Egert/>
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>