[c-nsp] Queuing on 1 Gig transit interfaces

David Granzer dgranzer at gmail.com
Tue Aug 19 05:43:59 EDT 2008


Hello,

if the interface is GigE with traffic at around 300Mb/s and there is
not any other back presure mechanism like traffic shaping then on the
interface is not congestion and the congestion management like WFQ is
not in use.

David


the congestion management is used only when

On 8/19/08, Nic Tjirkalli <nic.tjirkalli at za.verizonbusiness.com> wrote:
>
>  howdy ho,
>
>  we have some transit interfaces taht are GIG E interfaces on CISCO 7500
>  and 7600 boxes. these interfaces run at most at around 300 Meg.
>
>  The current queuing scheme on them is FIFO.
>
>  we have some operational folk who are making sounds that they want the
>  queuing to be WFQ as these boxes are pushing a mix of internet traffic and
>  VOIP packets (RTP packets)
>
>  My feelings are to leave the queuing as FIFO but was wondering if others
>  had some feelings or expierence in this
>
>  thanking you in advance for any thoughts or info
>
>  later
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Knowledge speaks, but wisdom listens.
>
>  Nic Tjirkalli
>  Verizon Business South Africa
>  Network Strategy Team
>
>  Verizon Business is a brand of Verizon South Africa (Pty) Ltd. This e-mail
>  is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the addressee unless
>  otherwise indicated.
>
>  Company Information:http://
> www.verizonbusiness.com/za/contact/legal/
>
>  This e-mail is strictly confidential and intended only for use by the
>  addressee unless otherwise indicated.
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list