[c-nsp] Unable to connect VLAN traffic

[Johnny Ramirez]

Thanks Ryan for clarifying what Justin said. I get it now. I hope they can accomodate that.
 
Johnny

--- On Tue, 8/19/08, Ryan Lambert <ryanclambert at gmail.com> wrote:

From: Ryan Lambert <ryanclambert at gmail.com>
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Unable to connect VLAN traffic
To: sforcejr at yahoo.com, "'Justin Shore'" <justin at justinshore.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 11:25 PM

Johnny,

I think the better solution if your provider can accommodate, is to do
Q-in-Q instead of having to dictate what tags you can use. This allows you,
as Justin mentioned, to use your own tags across the circuit instead of
having to coordinate with them every time you need to add another VLAN, or
change something.

-Ryan


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Johnny Ramirez
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 11:55 PM
To: Justin Shore
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Unable to connect VLAN traffic


Justin,
 
I appreciate your well explained answer. So basically they would tell me
what VLANs I should use for me to match them.
 
 
Thanks
 
 
 
John--- On Tue, 8/19/08, Justin Shore <justin at justinshore.com> wrote:

From: Justin Shore justin at justinshore.com 
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Unable to connect VLAN traffic
To: "Johnny Ramirez" <sforcejr at yahoo.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 9:41 PM

Johnny Ramirez wrote:
> We have layer 2 connectivity from our main office to an offsite facility
where our servers reside. We are connected via fiber but is not a dedicated
circuit.
>  
> Recently I  created a VLAN with same ID on both switches (main office and
Offsite facility) . I trunked the port on both ends but not traffic passes
on
this VLAN. Obviously only VLAN 1 works. According to a consultant the
provider
of the fiber connection needs to turn "something" on  for us to be
able to pass VLAN traffic other than VLAN 1's. What would be that
"something", he does not even kow it himself. 
>  
> Can anybody shed any light on this?. We are urgently needing to have a
separate VLAN for our VOIP traffic.

John,

Basically what this amounts to is that your transport provider is only 
accepting untagged Ethernet frames and thus only the one VLAN you 
previously used on your access interface.  You need the provider to 
accept tagged Ethernet frames so that tagged frames from each of your 
VLANs will be accepted for transport.  The provider may either dictate 
to you what VLAN IDs you must use.  They may use Q-in-Q (aka VLAN 
stacking) to assign their own tag in front of your tags.  This would 
give you the most flexibility and will keep you from having to work with 
them to allow future VLANs across the trunk.

Justin




      
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/