[c-nsp] 3560 ACL performance?

[rendo]

hi,

is there any exact/rough number of acl which doesn't impact the cpu?
or how can we check/make sure that the cpu will not be impacted if the
traffic increasing?

Thanks.

./rendo

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Brian Turnbow <b.turnbow at twt.it> wrote:
>
> We use them and have never experienced problems as long as you keep in the tcam space.
> With too many routes/acls ecc they punt to cpu.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Christian MacNevin
> Sent: venerdì 15 agosto 2008 6.00
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] 3560 ACL performance?
>
> Hi
> So the marketing machine tells me 3650s do ACLs in hardware and zero
> performance hit blah blah.
> Anyone had any real world experience with high loads of packets on
> every interface under a simple ACL?
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/