[c-nsp] Adding connected routes in a VRF

[jason.plank at comcast.net]

I would hope so. :)

--
Regards,

Jason Plank
CCIE #16560
e: jason.plank at comcast.net

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)" <oboehmer at cisco.com>
> Ross Vandegrift <> wrote on Monday, December 08, 2008 20:31:
> 
> > ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan1234
> > 
> > However, there's a syntax ambiguity when you place this in a VRF,
> > since this is how you leak traffic out of a VRF:
> > 
> > ip route vrf foobar 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Vlan1234
> > % For VPN routes, must specify a next hop IP address if not a
> > point-to-point interface 
> >
> > Is there any way to get the global table behavior in a VRF?
> 
> No, the next-hop address is required..
> 
> 	oli
> 
> P.S: I guess we would also require this for global if we implemented
> this today..
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/