[c-nsp] 3550 routing performance

Tony td_miles at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 30 17:26:34 EST 2008

Thanks for those who helped with this. I am ashamed to admit that despite my best intent at testing this thoroughly it was indeed a duplex mismatch (Doh!). That fixed the problem in my test environment, now I need to find out where it is in the prodcution setup and correct it.

Thanks again,

--- On Wed, 31/12/08, Marko Milivojevic <markom at markom.info> wrote:

> From: Marko Milivojevic <markom at markom.info>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3550 routing performance
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Date: Wednesday, 31 December, 2008, 2:36 AM
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 08:01, Tony
> <td_miles at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > I should have included that in my original post, I had
> already set SDM to routing extended-match. If you don't
> you get a warning when you add a VRF to prompt you to do it.
> >
> > Unfortunately not something that obvious.
> I'm a bit slow in reading the mailing lists :-).
> Did you reload the switch after you applied new SDM
> template? Also,
> are you sure that you are not experiencing "duplex
> mismatch" or some
> similar issue? Do interface counters show anything unusual?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list