[c-nsp] OSPF router gets separated from a broadcast domain
Peter Rathlev
peter at rathlev.dk
Fri Feb 1 07:09:10 EST 2008
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:37 +0100, Gabor Ivanszky wrote:
> Christopher E. Brown wrote:
> >
> >> the point is that even if all your devices speak OSPF, they will
> >> suffer from this issue as well.
> >> d4 speaking OSPF doesn't help Router A not to use it's connected
> >> interface to try to reach the network, and d4 also(and all the
> >> possible networks behind d4), still creating the blackhole, as far as
> >> our tests shows.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > The point is that subnets should be transport or destination, *not
> > both*. The partition of a OSPF speaking transport network does not
> > matter, only the partition of a destination subnet (or a shared
> > transport+dest subnet).
> >
> >
> That makes sense. But our experience in a real life scenario is that the
> partitioning of "OSPF speaking transport network" creates the blackhole
> as well. I will try to build this in the lab. May the root cause of the
> blackhole wasn't the network separation, but something else...
If you only use these networks as OSPF transport networks, it's not a
big problem if they're black holed. Since they're not destinations,
neither clients nor servers ever see them in anything but a trace.
Just make sure that you have a bit bucket to collect them, and make sure
to correct the problem asap of course.
Regards,
Peter
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list