[c-nsp] BFD aware VRF

Stephen Fulton sf at lists.esoteric.ca
Tue Feb 5 09:42:32 EST 2008


I'm speaking with our account rep today about the ME6524, and I'll bring 
this up.  If anyone with Cisco Process Clue(tm) could share with me the 
direction I should point her, please let me know off-list.

-- Stephen

Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
>>> I did try with an ethernet link between PE and CE, and bfd config looks
>>> good.
>> Unless you're Ethernet links are 1Q trunks like what you'd have between
>> a site with a pair of redundant routers doing both L3 and access layer
>> connections (FHRPs).  SRC removed BFD on SVI support, as did SXH on the
>> ME6524s.
>>
>> Yes, I'm beating a dead horse but it aggravates me nonetheless.  I need
>> to upgrade to SRC but I am going to lose BFD support as soon as I do,
>> pushing my recovery times up into seconds; far from the milliseconds
>> Cisco sold us on when they blessed this design.
> 
> And I'm still waiting for the reason why this has been removed from
> the code, or why it's an issue to support BFD with SVI.
> 
> And I'll keep beating both dead horses, at least till Cisco or Juniper
> (EX series) comes up with a solution.
> 
> 
> Rubens
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list