[c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 & 7200 config clarification
Justin Shore
justin at justinshore.com
Tue Feb 5 15:15:40 EST 2008
Bill,
I'm in a similar boat as Jose. What options for EoMPLS do we people
with 6700s have? I'm trying physical to physical with no luck.
Sub-interface isn't an option for a particular design that I'm working
on either.
Thanks
Justin
Bill Wade (wwade) wrote:
> Jose,
>
> SVI (vlan interface) based EoMPLS requires an OSM, SIP-400, SIP-600
> or ES-20 as core facing interface.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jose
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 11:16 AM
>> To: Cisco
>> Subject: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 & 7200 config clarification
>>
>> Hi everyone. I'm doing some preliminary testing in our lab
>> in order to deploy EoMPLS on our ethernet network but I've
>> run into a little bit of a snag and was wondering if anyone
>> could clarify something for me.
>>
>> The setup I have is 3550---7603-SUP32---7204VXR---3550
>>
>> I have VLAN 800 setup to cross from one 3550 to the other.
>> The relevant portions of the config are as follows:
>>
>> 7603:
>> interface GigabitEthernet2/2
>> description to 3550
>> switchport
>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 800
>> switchport mode trunk
>> no ip address
>> load-interval 30
>> !
>> interface Vlan800
>> xconnect 10.0.1.4 800 encapsulation mpls !
>> interface GigabitEthernet1/1
>> description 7603 to 7204
>> switchport
>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 220
>> switchport mode trunk
>> no ip address
>> load-interval 30
>> !
>> interface Vlan220
>> ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252
>> load-interval 30
>> tag-switching mtu 1520
>> tag-switching ip
>> !
>>
>> 7204VXR:
>> interface FastEthernet1/0.220
>> encapsulation dot1Q 220
>> ip address 10.0.0.17 255.255.255.252
>> ip ospf cost 40
>> tag-switching mtu 1520
>> tag-switching ip
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet3/0.800
>> encapsulation dot1Q 800
>> xconnect 10.0.1.1 800 encapsulation mpls !
>>
>> Now when I do a "show mpls l2 vc" I can see the circuit up
>> from the 7204 side but down from the 7603 side. I think I
>> have everything setup properly but can't figure out why it
>> wouldn't work.
>>
>> If I change things around a bit and reconfigure the 7603 to
>> use sub-interfaces with dot1q instead of vlan interfaces like this:
>>
>> interface GigabitEthernet2/2.800
>> encapsulation dot1Q 800
>> xconnect 10.0.1.4 800 encapsulation mpls !
>>
>> The circuit is up from both ends and pings from/to each 3550
>> are successful:
>>
>> frort01-lab#sh mpls l2 vc
>>
>> Local intf Local circuit Dest address VC ID
>> Status
>> ------------- -------------------- ---------------
>> ---------- ----------
>> Gi2/2.800 Eth VLAN 800 10.0.1.4 800
>> UP
>> 7603-lab#
>>
>> Is this the only way to get EoMPLS to work between these two
>> devices?
>> I'm sure I've seen the xconnect command used on VLAN
>> interfaces before and it has worked fine.
>>
>> Any thoughts or comments would be greatly appreaciated.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jose
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list