[c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 & 7200 config clarification

Justin Shore justin at justinshore.com
Tue Feb 5 15:15:40 EST 2008


Bill,

I'm in a similar boat as Jose.  What options for EoMPLS do we people 
with 6700s have?  I'm trying physical to physical with no luck. 
Sub-interface isn't an option for a particular design that I'm working 
on either.

Thanks
  Justin


Bill Wade (wwade) wrote:
> Jose,
> 
> SVI (vlan interface) based EoMPLS requires an OSM, SIP-400, SIP-600
> or ES-20 as core facing interface.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jose
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 11:16 AM
>> To: Cisco
>> Subject: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between 7600 & 7200 config clarification
>>
>> Hi everyone.  I'm doing some preliminary testing in our lab 
>> in order to deploy EoMPLS on our ethernet network but I've 
>> run into a little bit of a snag and was wondering if anyone 
>> could clarify something for me.
>>
>> The setup I have is 3550---7603-SUP32---7204VXR---3550
>>
>> I have VLAN 800 setup to cross from one 3550 to the other.  
>> The relevant portions of the config are as follows:
>>
>> 7603:
>> interface GigabitEthernet2/2
>>  description to 3550
>>  switchport
>>  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>  switchport trunk allowed vlan 800
>>  switchport mode trunk
>>  no ip address
>>  load-interval 30
>> !
>> interface Vlan800
>>  xconnect 10.0.1.4 800 encapsulation mpls !
>> interface GigabitEthernet1/1
>>  description 7603 to 7204
>>  switchport
>>  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>  switchport trunk allowed vlan 220
>>  switchport mode trunk
>>  no ip address
>>  load-interval 30
>> !
>> interface Vlan220
>>  ip address 10.0.0.18 255.255.255.252
>>  load-interval 30
>>  tag-switching mtu 1520
>>  tag-switching ip
>> !
>>
>> 7204VXR:
>> interface FastEthernet1/0.220
>>  encapsulation dot1Q 220
>>  ip address 10.0.0.17 255.255.255.252
>>  ip ospf cost 40
>>  tag-switching mtu 1520
>>  tag-switching ip
>> !
>> interface FastEthernet3/0.800
>>  encapsulation dot1Q 800
>>  xconnect 10.0.1.1 800 encapsulation mpls !
>>
>> Now when I do a "show mpls l2 vc" I can see the circuit up 
>> from the 7204 side but down from the 7603 side.  I think I 
>> have everything setup properly but can't figure out why it 
>> wouldn't work.
>>
>> If I change things around a bit and reconfigure the 7603 to 
>> use sub-interfaces with dot1q instead of vlan interfaces like this:
>>
>> interface GigabitEthernet2/2.800
>>  encapsulation dot1Q 800
>>  xconnect 10.0.1.4 800 encapsulation mpls !
>>
>> The circuit is up from both ends and pings from/to each 3550 
>> are successful:
>>
>> frort01-lab#sh mpls l2 vc
>>
>> Local intf     Local circuit        Dest address    VC ID     
>>  Status    
>> -------------  -------------------- --------------- 
>> ---------- ----------
>> Gi2/2.800      Eth VLAN 800         10.0.1.4        800       
>>  UP        
>> 7603-lab#
>>
>> Is this the only way to get EoMPLS to work between these two 
>> devices?  
>> I'm sure I've seen the xconnect command used on VLAN 
>> interfaces before and it has worked fine.
>>
>> Any thoughts or comments would be greatly appreaciated.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Jose
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list