[c-nsp] dead WIC-1ADSL?

Adam Greene maillist at webjogger.net
Fri Feb 8 09:23:01 EST 2008


Thanks, guys for the feedback.

Tried with another WIC-1ADSL and had same results. 

Rebooted router: it worked.

Conclusion: card is not hot-swappable. Duh!


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ben Steele" <ben at internode.com.au>
To: "Pete Templin" <petelists at templin.org>
Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] dead WIC-1ADSL?


> Yes sorry Pete your right, I was thinking of the HWIC-1ADSL when I  
> wrote you need 12.4T and copying in 12.3(8)T from the  
> WIC-1ADSL...sigh, so yes a plain WIC-1ADSL should be mainline in 12.4,  
> need more zzzzzzz :)
> 
> 
> On 05/02/2008, at 12:28 PM, Pete Templin wrote:
> 
>> Ben Steele wrote:
>>> Oh and in regards to actaully getting it show up, you need a T  
>>> train  IOS, 12.3(8)T and on..
>>
>> Ok, I'm going to throw the "huh?" flag here.  It's been my  
>> understanding for years that x.yT becomes x.(y+1) mainline, and on  
>> that date the following things happen:
>>
>> x.(y+1) inherits all of the features of x.yT at that moment
>> x.(y+1) moves forward with ONLY that list of features
>> x.yT stops receiving (most) new features at that moment
>> x.(y+1)T is created and begins receiving new features
>>
>> As such, if a feature came out in 12.3(8)T, one could find it in  
>> 12.4 (and wouldn't HAVE to go to 12.4T just to keep the feature).   
>> Am I wrong (for the most part...let's not nitpick over exceptions)?
>>
>> (Obviously, every now and then Cisco chooses to use (x+1).0 instead  
>> of x.(y+1), but that's immaterial for this discussion.)
>>
>> pt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
> 
> 
>






More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list