[c-nsp] TTL decrement through FWSM

[Christian Koch]

what code was this in?

thanks for the info as well, from this and all the responses of my other
fwsm thread, i am finding out tons of  useful  information :)

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Peter Rathlev <peter at rathlev.dk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I can see there was a thread from May 2006 about the FWSM and TTL
> decrements. The FWSM doesn't show up in traceroutes because of this, and
> that is sometimes not good seen from a debugging perspective.
>
> Does anybody know if this has been "corrected" in the meantime? Is there
> really no way of having the FWSM decrement TTL and send back
> unreachables for traffic passing through it?
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>