[c-nsp] Full BGP tables on 3825/3845?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:58:48AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Is anyone using a 3825/3845 w/ 1GB to get full routing tables from 2 
> upstreams?  Or is it better to go with a 7201 w/ 1GB?

From the routerperformance.pdf, the NPE-G2 (7201) should be approximately
3 times as fast in terms of PPS as the 3845.

So my answer would be "make it dependant on price, required interfaces, and 
required throughput".

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080220/4f533bbf/attachment-0001.bin