[c-nsp] redundant VPNs

Wyatt Mattias Ishmael Jovial Gyllenvarg wyatt.eliasson at gmail.com
Fri Feb 22 10:38:05 EST 2008


I have done this (though without encryption) with 1801W units in both ends.
Required some creative routing but works well when all is done.
You will offcourse get a lower MTU then before.

Best regards
Mattias Gyllenvarg
Skycom AB

>  A customer of ours has two sites, one with an 1800 the other with a 2800. There's a point-to-point T1 connecting the locations. The two locations also have a backup link through my network via DSL.
>
>  The customer wants to establish a VPN between the two locations over the ptp T1, and a backup VPN over the DSL lines in case the ptp T1 goes down.
>
>  I should be able to rely on the 1800/2800 for this, shouldn't I? I can add sonicwalls on each end if needed, but I think the routers should be able to handle it alone. What do you think?
>
>  Thanks,
>  Adam
>
> _______________________________________________
>  cisco-nsp mailing list
>  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list