[c-nsp] STP to L2 FTTx gear
Justin Shore
justin at justinshore.com
Sun Jan 6 02:20:09 EST 2008
Given all the STP questions on the list this past week I thought I'd add
mine to the group while STP is on everyones' minds.
We've recently deployed the beginning of our FTTx offering. The vendor
we went with is L2-only (that's a good thing). The GigE rings have been
built and the L3 side of things on my 7600s has been built. I'm meeting
the FTTx gear with 5 VLANs on 2x 1Q trunks for redundancy from, 1 trunk
from each 7600. The 5 VLANs are allowed across the port-channel between
the 7600s and I'm running HSRP on each SVI. We didn't set up the trunks
with a native VLAN. The config is fairly basic.
interface GigabitEthernet1/9
description TO FTTx
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 800,801,811,821,831,851
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast trunk
I'm leaving out the SVIs unless someone thinks their pertinent. The
current default spanning tree mode for both 7600s is PVST. The problem
I has is that I can't have both physical interfaces (the trunks) turned
up at the same time. Doing so causes 2 of my VLANs to go into blocking:
7613-1# sh spanning-tree interface gi1/9
Vlan Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
------------------- ---- --- --------- --------
--------------------------------
VLAN0800 Desg FWD 4 128.9 Edge P2p
VLAN0801 Desg BKN*4 128.9 Edge P2p *PVID_Inc
VLAN0811 Desg BKN*4 128.9 Edge P2p *PVID_Inc
VLAN0821 Desg FWD 4 128.9 Edge P2p
VLAN0831 Desg FWD 4 128.9 Edge P2p
VLAN0851 Desg FWD 4 128.9 Edge P2p
Same thing for the other 7600. The FTTx vendor set up the hardware to
not participate in any form of STP on the interfaces facing my 7600s.
They're running EPS on the GigE rings. I haven't sniffed this yet to
prove it but I expect to see all BPDUs leaving Gi1/9 on one 7600 being
received on Gi1/9 of the other 7600 untouched by what's in the middle.
So, my question is which form of STP would be best for this particular
scenario? 1d, 1w, PVST, Rapid-PVST or should I be looking at MST? I
don't care about load-balancing at the present. It would be nice is the
physical link mimicked HSRP but I'm not that picky. I'm assuming that
the FTTx vendor could participate in 1d or 1w if I asked but not having
to have that level of integration could be a good thing. One less thing
to troubleshoot when something breaks.
Suggestions? Thanks
Justin
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list