[c-nsp] 7604/sup32 (minor correction) - TCAM route aggregation

[Phil Mayers]

Nicolas DEFFAYET wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 11:28 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:59:21AM +0100, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
>>> We are using Sup32 with  12.2(18)SXF11 for more than 2.5 months without a 
>>> problem (Earlier we used 12.2(18)SXF10) - of course without full routing 
>>> table....
>> Have you been hit by "more prefixes in the RIB than would fit into TCAM"?
> 
> Hum, why Cisco don't create a software feature for be able to store
> aggragated routes in the TCAM ?

This hypothetical feature (much like the entire topic under discussion, 
sigh) has been discussed several times on the list. See the archives:

http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/2007-March/039196.html

...is the 3rd hit for "cisco-nsp tcam aggregation" on google, for example.