[c-nsp] 7604/sup32 (minor correction)
David Granzer
dgranzer at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 10:52:08 EST 2008
On 1/9/08, Euan Galloway <euang+cisco-nsp at lists.eusahues.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:51:21AM +0100, David Granzer wrote:
>
> > FIB TCAM maximum routes :
> > =======================
> > Current :-
> > -------
> > IPv4 - 239k
> >
> > Total routes: 243424
> > IPv4 unicast routes: 241202
> >
> > L3 Forwarding Resources
> > FIB TCAM usage: Total Used %Used
> > 72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM) 245760 242228 99%
>
> Based on those numbers have you not already exhausted the 1k of TCAM space
> you've reserved for MPLS?
below is more detailed output
L3 Forwarding Resources
FIB TCAM usage: Total Used %Used
72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM) 245760 243587 99%
144 bits (IP mcast, IPv6) 8192 1193 15%
detail: Protocol Used %Used
IPv4 242563 99%
MPLS 1024 1%
EoM 0 0%
IPv6 1050 13%
IPv4 mcast 143 2%
IPv6 mcast 0 0%
Total routes: 244778
IPv4 unicast routes: 242566
IPv4 Multicast routes: 139
MPLS routes: 1023
IPv6 unicast routes: 1050
IPv6 multicast routes: 0
EoM routes: 0
David
> IPv4 + MPLS + EoM = 242228 (used), (from 245760 avail, but split 244736 to IPv4
> and 1024 to MPLS)
> IPv4 = 241202
> MPLS + EoM (EoMPLS?) using the remaining 1026 ?
>
> or do the numbers just not add right (non-shocker).
>
> --
> Euan Galloway
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list