[c-nsp] 6748 compatibility with the 7600/RSP720 series.

[Hank Nussbacher]

At 09:33 AM 15-01-08 +0200, Gabriel Mateiciuc wrote:

In addition you might want to review this 4 year old test results:
http://www.eantc.com/fileadmin/eantc/downloads/test_reports/2003-2005/EANTC-Summary-Report-Cisco-GigE-Catalyst6500-Supervisor720.pdf

-Hank

>The 67xx are the best you can get for density and high performance. For high
>traffic through the box I recommend dfc's for the linecard.
>As others have outlined, there are some fancy cards (Ethernet service
>modules) but you should look for the features you need and see if you
>require those.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of sf at lists.esoteric.ca
>Sent: 14 ianuarie 2008 19:02
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: [c-nsp] 6748 compatibility with the 7600/RSP720 series.
>
>Hi all,
>
>I'm looking at the 7600/RSP720 series, and I'm wondering if there are any
>"gotchas" or issues with the 6748GE line-card?  I need the port density,
>so the SPA/SIP's do not meet my needs.
>
>Thanks,
>
>-- Stephen
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/