[c-nsp] 6748 compatibility with the 7600/RSP720 series.
Saku Ytti
saku+cisco-nsp at ytti.fi
Tue Jan 15 04:27:32 EST 2008
On (2008-01-15 09:38 +0200), Gabriel Mateiciuc wrote:
> Can you give an example for configuring a second tag (qinq) ? I know this
> sounds like a stupid question, but it kind'a sounds like you don't have to
> set a default tag for the native vlan on the box - that was the only way
> cisco sais it can be done, or wasn't I looking hard enough ?
LAB-P1(config)#int giga3/0/11.4242
LAB-P1(config-subif)#encap dot1q 42 second 42
LAB-P1(config-subif)#ip address 42.42.42.1 255.255.255.0
LAB-P1(config-subif)#^Z
LAB-P1#show run int
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 138 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/11.4242
encapsulation dot1Q 42 second-dot1q 42
ip address 42.42.42.1 255.255.255.0
end
LAB-P1#sh ver | i ^.isco
Cisco IOS Software, c7600rsp72043_rp Software (c7600rsp72043_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.2(33)SRC, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
Cisco CISCO7609 (M8500) processor (revision 1.2) with 1835008K/131072K bytes of memory.
LAB-P1#show module | i ^ +3
3 20 ESM20G 7600-ES20-GE3CXL JAB113601H7
3 001d.455a.0c80 to 001d.455a.0cff 1.0 12.2(33r)SRB 12.2(33)SRC Ok
3 ESM20G Distributed Forwardi 7600-ES20-D3CXL JAB113601L4 1.0 Ok
3/0 10XGE Port 7600-ES20-20GE JAB1134029V 1.0 Ok
3/1 10XGE Port 7600-ES20-20GE JAB1134029V 1.0 Ok
3 Pass
3/0 Pass
3/1 Pass
LAB-P1#remote command module 3 sh ver | i ^.isco
Cisco IOS Software, cwlc Software (sip10g-DW-M), Version 12.2(33)SRC, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc3)
cisco CWAN Modular Service Card (SIP-600) (SB-1) processor (revision 0xFF) with 1015808K/32767K bytes of memory.
LAB-P1#sh int giga3/0/11.4242 | i Hardware
Hardware is GigEther SPA, address is 0015.c721.75c0 (bia 0015.c721.75c0)
You can also do it in the EVC much more flexibly pop/push 1 or 2 tags,
explicitly or depending on previous tag values etc.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Saku Ytti
> Sent: 14 ianuarie 2008 22:44
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6748 compatibility with the 7600/RSP720 series.
>
> On (2008-01-14 20:21 +0100), Peter Rathlev wrote:
>
> > The WS-X6748-GE-TX is a LAN card, so you can't really compare it to
> > SPAs. If you need more advanced features than just switching (and what
> > the PFC gives you), and still need to port density, you should look at
> > the Ethernet Services modules instead, like ES20-GE3C. It gives you 20
> > GigabitEthernet ports (SFP) and PXF processing.
>
> Just small tip that might surprise SIP/SPA folks, ES20 does not, at this
> time support VLAN local significance in subinterfaces, when using
> single tags.
>
> this is no go
> int giga1/0/1.42
> encap dot1q 42
> int giga1/0/2.42
> encpp dot1q 42
>
> Add 2nd (Qinq) tag to the interfaces, and it works. You can workaround
> this to some level by using EVC config and unique SVI's, but you lose
> some features with SVI, such as only MQC match supported today is CoS.
>
> --
> ++ytti
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
++ytti
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list