[c-nsp] RFC 1918 on loopback?

[nachocheeze at gmail.com]

On Jan 15, 2008 10:20 AM,  <nachocheeze at gmail.com> wrote:

>   I've been
> asked if it's possible to move our loopback addresses to private
> space, and since currently the only purpose they currently serve is
> for IGP router-id, it seems reasonable (except on our BGP speaking
> Internet border routers).

I hate replying to my own posts, but just to clarify; router transit
interfaces would remain on public space; only the loopbacks would be
renumbered.