[c-nsp] 12.2(18)SXF question

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:25:40PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> We are on 12.2(18)SXE6b (7600-SUP720/MSFC3) .  We are installing a SIP-400 
> and the SPA-1XOC48POS/RPR which based on the release notes requires 
> 12.2(18)SXF10 or higher.   Since there is already SXF11 and SXF12 and 
> SXF12a out already can anyone recommend which version to stay away from or 
> which version is rock stable?

We're happy with SXF11.  

OTOH, SXF12*a* must be there for a reason.  So checking release notes and
bug lists might be good plan...

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080117/08be29fd/attachment.bin