[c-nsp] RIB_failure

[Suzan S.]

Dear Cielieska,
   
  But is it recomended to change the administrative distance?
  Some guys suggested to add the network backdoor command to solve the problem which is better than changing the adminstrative distance.
   
  Thank you
  Suzan

Cielieska Nathan <ncielieska at gmail.com> wrote:
  Suzan,

In my experience, this is by design. The RIB failure is blocking BGP 
from putting this route into the routing table because the IGP with 
the lower administrative distance has trumped it. If you set the BGP 
routes lower than the admin distance of the IGP, the BGP router will 
kick those routes out of RIB-failure state.

Regards,
Nate
On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Suzan S. wrote:

> Dears,
>
> When advertiseing the loopbacks in the bgp , they appear as RIB- 
> failure routes in the BGP table as they are advertised through the 
> IGP which has better adminstrative distance. Any one knows how to 
> solve the problem of these RIB-failure Routes? Do we have to change 
> the administrative distance for the IGP or BGP ? In some documents 
> I read that we have to use the command bgp suppress-active under 
> the router bgp config but it does not work.
>
> Thank you All
>
> Suzan
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! 
> Search.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> _
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



       
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.