[c-nsp] MUX

[Peter Rathlev]

Hi Mad,

CWDM is a nice and (relatively) cheap solution, but of course it
requires special colour GBICs at each end.

The cost of the passive CWDM muxer and special GBICs + stock for a rainy
day can sometimes make provisioning an extra physical fiber look more
attractive than otherwise, especially for short distances. But YMMV.

Regards,
Peter

On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 22:41 +0100, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:
> Mr. madunix, 
> 
> Not sure what your requirements are, but if all you need is multiple
> GigE links over the same fiber, take a look at this:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6575/index.html
> 
> Arie
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mad Unix
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 21:44 PM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] MUX
> 
> Dear ALL
> 
> We are looking to get a MUX for the Fiber between our 2 buildings...
> out of your experience , what do you think about getting "*Marconi OMS"
> *
> http://www.ericsson.com/solutions/products/hp/Optical_Networks_pa.shtml
> since our LAN and WAN built on Cisco and Exterme devices.
> 
> Thanks
> --
> madunix
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/