[c-nsp] 6500 12.2.33-SXH1 modular IOS

Jeff Fitzwater jfitz at Princeton.EDU
Tue Jan 29 14:55:43 EST 2008


We are upgrading our sup-720-3Bs to the 720-CXL with 10G ports, which  
requires the SXH code.
Makes me a little nervous ~~~~~


Jeff Fitzwater


On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Gregori Parker wrote:

> Crippled indeed - I had 5sec-CPU samples spiking to 80% and above,
> causing packet loss in our core with all SXF modular releases.   
> Because
> of this, modular code has been relegated to the most experimental
> reaches of our network lab...I'm in wait-and-see mode for SXH.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:34 AM
> To: Jeff Fitzwater
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6500 12.2.33-SXH1 modular IOS
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:35 -0500, Jeff Fitzwater wrote:
>> 	I would like to test the 12.2.33-SXH1 code in our 6500 720 and
> see
>> there are two versions MODULAR and NON-MODULAR for the advanced IP
>> with SSH.   I would like to use the modular because of the new
>> security feature for multiple login levels for WEB access. Does
>> anybody have any experience with the version of code or know of  an
>> issues with the modular version.    Maybe its way to earlier to go
>> modular.
>
> The modular images have been a little "crippled", although the SXH1
> release should make up for some of that. If you browse through the
> release notes there should be a link to "Cisco IOS Software Modularity
> Unsupported Features".
>
> We're about to run tests on SXH1, so I don't have any practical
> experience yet.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list