[c-nsp] Switch cluster with 2950 and 3750 stack

[luismi]

Thanks for the fast answer!! :D

El lun, 07-07-2008 a las 11:35 +0200, Pavel Skovajsa escribió:
> Hi,
> no this is not possible. Etherchannel is always one logical device to
> another logical device.
> 
> For example two 2950 to each other.
> Or stack of 3750 to one 2950
> or stack of 3750 to stack of 3750
> or the newest edge bleeding etherchannel setup (google up MEC) is: VSS
> 1440 (2x650x) to 2950
> 
> pavel
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:16 AM, luismi <asturluismi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I need to redesign an smaill network here.
> > It is working with now with just a 2950 but I would like to improve the
> > availability.
> >
> > I have some dudes that they will be probably answered in some place in
> > Internet but I didn't find that place yet.
> >
> > The actual scenario is:
> > 1 x 2950 connected to a 3750 stack
> >
> > The future scensario I would like to have is:
> > 2 x 2950 connected to a 3750 stack
> >
> > Well, the reason to use 2950 is that we have several 2950 switches here
> > and there is no reason to make a new invesment since they are enough for
> > our requirements, they load is also quite small.
> >
> > I would like to do a cluster with the 2950 switches probably using some
> > GigaStack Gbics.
> >
> > The question is...
> > As soon as I create the cluster in the 2950 switches, is it possible to
> > create a port-channel (one port from one 2950 and one port from the
> > other 2950) against a port-channel at the 3750 stack side?
> >
> > I hope someone in this list can answer that.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >