[c-nsp] Source failure in PIM SSM

Jeff Tantsura jeff.nsp at gmail.com
Wed Jun 4 12:18:44 EDT 2008


Hi,

I don't think there's much more than that, any other technology would be
some kind of prioritycast, it's just about how to make one route more
preferable than the other, different metrics, different prefix length etc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of alaerte.vidali at nsn.com
> Sent: woensdag 4 juni 2008 16:56
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Source failure in PIM SSM
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Any recommendation for docs handling source failure when PIM SSM is
> used?
> 
> Example:
> 
> Source 1.1.1.1, group 239.1.1.1 -----R1--------R2--PC_joined 239.1.1.1
> using IGMPv2
> 
> R2 has SSM mapping group 239.1.1.1 to sorce 1.1.1.1
> 
> I have seem 2 options: Anycast and Prioritycast. Would like to here
> other opinion.
> 
> Tks,
> Alaerte
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list