[c-nsp] CBWFQ/PQ Support on 6500/SUP720-3BXL

David Granzer dgranzer at gmail.com
Wed Jun 11 07:52:07 EDT 2008


On 6/11/08, Zahid  Hassan <zhassan at gmx.net> wrote:
> Thanks Douglas, I am still tyring to the find out if there is a way to  do this with wrr-queues.
>
>  The bit that I am not sure about is how to match on EXP bits within wrr-queues.
>
>
>  Does anyone know if this is at all possible ?

Zahid see what I wrote in preceding email. I think this is what you want.

For MPLS packets the EXP value is mapped into an internal DSCP and you
can assign into wrr queues according DSCP value.

David

>
>
>  Regards,
>
>
>  Zahid
>
>
>
>
>  -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>  > Datum: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:52:42 -0400
>  > Von: "Todd, Douglas M." <DTODD at PARTNERS.ORG>
>
> > An: "Zahid Hassan" <zhassan at gmx.net>
>
> > CC: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>  > Betreff: RE: [c-nsp] CBWFQ/PQ Support on 6500/SUP720-3BXL
>
>
>  > Zahid:
>  >
>  > We were looking at the same senerio and found that we must use a SIP type
>  > card
>  > to do any traffic shaping.  The 6500 does not have this type of feature.
>  > SIP-200/400 for either DS1/100FD/1G type of connections.
>  >
>  > Hope this helps.
>  >
>  > Douglas
>  >
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>  > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David Granzer
>  > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 5:46 AM
>  > To: Zahid Hassan
>  > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>  > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] CBWFQ/PQ Support on 6500/SUP720-3BXL
>  >
>  > On 6/11/08, Zahid  Hassan <zhassan at gmx.net> wrote:
>  > > Many thanks for this David.
>  > >
>  > >  Yes, the "priority" and as well as the "bandwidth" command doesn't
>  > > seems to be supported in either ingress or egress direction.
>  > >
>  > >  I am thinking of configuring "wrr-queues" and I don't know  if I can
>  > > at all match on EXP bits.
>  > >
>  > >  Does anyone know how to match on EXP bits within a wrr-queue ?
>  >
>  > For MPLS packets, the EXP value is mapped into an internal DSCP so that
>  > the
>  > PFC3BXL or PFC3B can apply non-MPLS QoS marking and policing.
>  >
>  > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SXF/native/con
>  > figuration/guide/mplsqos.html
>  >
>  > David
>  >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  Thanks in advance.
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  Zahid
>  > >
>  > >  -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>  > >  > Datum: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:36:32 +0200  > Von: "David Granzer"
>  > > <dgranzer at gmail.com>  > An: "Zahid Hassan" <zhassan at gmx.net>  > CC:
>  > > "Cisco NSP Puck Nether Net (Cisco NSP)" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>,
>  > > zhassan at bis-internet.co.uk  > Betreff: Re: [c-nsp] CBWFQ/PQ Support on
>  > > 6500/SUP720-3BXL
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >  > Hello,
>  > >  >
>  > >  > n 6/11/08, Zahid Hassan <zhassan at gmx.net> wrote:
>  > >  > > Dear All,
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  I have a requirement to implement CBWFQ/LLQ matching  > >  on
>  > > EXP bits on a 6500 with SUP720-3BXL.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  Since the "priority" command is not supported within a
>  > > policy-map,  > >  I am wondering if this can be achieved using
>  > "wrr-queues".
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  This is the failure message when I apply the service-policy:
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  6500(config-if)#service-policy input CORE-THREE-CLASS  > >
>  > > priority command is not supported in input direction  > >  for this
>  > > interface configuration failed!
>  > >  >
>  > >  > above you try using priority in ingress direction which is not  >
>  > > supported generally. Second problem in your case will be that  >
>  > > 6500/7600 LAN cards does not support CBWFQ like 7200/7301 etc. You  >
>  > > must use L2 QoS, see  "Quality of Service on Cisco Catalyst 6500"
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/prod_
>  > > white_paper0900aecd803e5269.html
>  > >  >
>  > >  > David
>  > >  >
>  > >  >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  This is for a WS-X6704-10GE linecard with supports 1p7q8t.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  I will be really grateful for input or pointers about this.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  Thanking in you advance.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  Regards,
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >  Zahid
>  > >  > >  _______________________________________________
>  > >  > >  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net  > >
>  > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>  > >  > >  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>  > >  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > --
>  > >  GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen!
>  > >  Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/?mc=sv_ext_mf@gmx
>  > >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>  > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>  >
>  > No virus found in this incoming message.
>  > Checked by AVG.
>  > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.2.0/1494 - Release Date: 6/10/2008
>  > 7:22
>  > AM
>  >
>  >
>  > The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended
>  > only
>  > for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
>  > confidential
>  > and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or
>  > other
>  > use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by
>  > persons or
>  > entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received
>  > this
>  > information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at
>  > 800-856-1983 and
>  > properly dispose of this information.
>  >
>  >
>
>
> --
>  Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
>  Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
>
> _______________________________________________
>  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>  archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list