[c-nsp] multihop VPDN Problem
Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)
oboehmer at cisco.com
Tue Jun 17 05:17:03 EDT 2008
I don't know why IPCP fails.. vtemplate config looks fine (very basic)..
can you show the full PPP debug and config on LNS2?
oli
Edi Guntoro <mailto:igoen99 at yahoo.com> wrote on Tuesday, June 17, 2008
10:46 AM:
> Hi Oli,
> Thanks for your input, now the lns1 can triger l2tp connection to
> lns2 (tunnel status established), but now the lns2 stuck on "IPCP:
> Currently stalled packet." I thought this is a matter of layer3
> connectivity and supplying IP address, I have check the ip pool.
> Regards
>
> interface Virtual-Template13
> ip unnumbered GigabitEthernet0/2
> peer default ip address pool multihop
> ppp mtu adaptive
> ppp authentication chap callin
> end
> #sh ip local pool
>
> Pool Begin End Free In use
> multihop 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.254 253 0
>
> *Jun 17 07:33:31.487: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [Initial] id 10 len 34
> *Jun 17 07:33:31.487: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:31.487: Vi2.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 0.0.0.0
> (0x810600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:31.487: Vi2.1 IPCP: PrimaryWINS 0.0.0.0
> (0x820600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:31.487: Vi2.1 IPCP: SecondaryDNS 0.0.0.0
> (0x830600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:31.487: Vi2.1 IPCP: SecondaryWINS 0.0.0.0
> (0x840600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:31.487: Vi2.1 IPCP: Update stall packet id [9] to [10]
> *Jun 17 07:33:35.491: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [Initial] id 11 len 10
> *Jun 17 07:33:35.491: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:35.495: Vi2.1 IPCP: Currently stalled packet. Discard
> incoming packet
> *Jun 17 07:33:39.547: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [Initial] id 12 len 10
> *Jun 17 07:33:39.547: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:39.547: Vi2.1 IPCP: Currently stalled packet. Discard
> incoming packet
> *Jun 17 07:33:43.607: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [Initial] id 13 len 10
> *Jun 17 07:33:43.607: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:43.607: Vi2.1 IPCP: Currently stalled packet. Discard
> incoming packet
> *Jun 17 07:33:47.607: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [Initial] id 14 len 10
> *Jun 17 07:33:47.607: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:47.607: Vi2.1 IPCP: Currently stalled packet. Discard
> incoming packet
> *Jun 17 07:33:51.611: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [Initial] id 15 len 10
> *Jun 17 07:33:51.611: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:51.611: Vi2.1 IPCP: Currently stalled packet. Discard
> incoming packet
> *Jun 17 07:33:56.103: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [Initial] id 16 len 10
> *Jun 17 07:33:56.103: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
> *Jun 17 07:33:56.103: Vi2.1 IPCP: Currently stalled packet. Discard
> incoming packet
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.127: Vi2.1 LCP: I TERMREQ [Open] id 17 len 16
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.127: Vi2.1 LCP: (0x57BC108C003CCD7400000000)
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.127: Vi2.1 IPCP: Event[DOWN] New State[Initial]
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.127: Vi2.1 IPCP: Event[CLOSE] New State[Initial]
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.127: Vi2.1 LCP: O TERMACK [Open] id 17 len 4
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.127: Vi2.1 LCP: Event[Receive TermReq] New
> State[Stopping]
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.127: Vi2.1 PPP DISC: Received LCP TERMREQ from peer
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.127: Vi2.1 PPP: Sending Acct Event[Down] id[F]
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.127: Vi2.1 PPP: Phase is TERMINATING
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: Perform early message digest
> validation for CDN
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: Control connection
> authentication skipped/passed.
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: Tunnel auth counter, Overall
> Skipped, now 6
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: I CDN from MY-ISG tnl
> 52436, cl 107
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: disconnect (AAA)
> IETF: 1/user-request Ascend: 28/PPP Receive Term
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: Destroying session
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: L2X Session DB (Tnl/Sn: 3162/3): Removed the
> control session from the session DB
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: Session state change
> from established to idle
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: PW-MGMT: PW peer
> 124.81.78.242, vcid 0
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: PW-MGMT: Reason
> [Protocol DOWN]
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: PW-MGMT: Local VC
> DOWN, Remote VC DOWN
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: PW-MGMT:
> Provisioned NO, Established NO
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: PW-MGMT: No change
> in PW state
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 LCP: Event[CLOSE] New State[Closing]
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: L2X request teardown
> data plane
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 Tnl/Sn 3162/3 L2TP: Unbinding session
> from idb
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 VPDN: Resetting interface
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 PPP: Block vaccess from being freed [0x10]
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: Tunnel state change from
> established to no-sessions-left
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: No more sessions in tunnel,
> shutdown (likely) in 10 seconds
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 LCP: Event[DOWN] New State[Initial]
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 PPP: Unlocked by [0x10] Still Locked by
> [0x0]
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 PPP: Free previously blocked vaccess
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: Vi2.1 PPP: Phase is DOWN
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: L2TP:(Tnl3162:Sn3)L2X s/w switching session
> unprovisioned
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.143: L2X Session DB (Tnl/Sn: 3162/3): Removed the
> switching session from the session DB
> *Jun 17 07:34:00.387: Vi2.1 PPP: Free Context [4652E08]
> *Jun 17 07:34:10.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: O StopCCN to MY-ISG tnlid 52436
> *Jun 17 07:34:10.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: Control channel retransmit
> delay set to 1 seconds
> *Jun 17 07:34:10.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: Tunnel state change from
> no-sessions-left to shutting-down
> *Jun 17 07:34:10.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: Early authen passing ZLB
> *Jun 17 07:34:10.143: Tnl 3162 L2TP: Shutdown tunnel
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) <oboehmer at cisco.com>
> To: Edi Guntoro <igoen99 at yahoo.com>; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:24:44 PM
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] multihop VPDN Problem
>
> Edi Guntoro <> wrote on Tuesday, June 17, 2008 3:52 AM:
>
>> DA,
>> I'm trying to setup multihop vpdn using cisco router, here are the
>> network diagram; PC<--pppoe-->LAC<--L2TP-->LNS1<--L2TP-->LNS2
>> But, I have a problem with the connection, LNS1 never triger L2tp
>> connection to LNS2. And on LNS2, I suspect the debug message "ppp48
>> PPP: LCP Jam failed on [MRU] option"
>
> I assume an MTU mismatch issue which can be resolved via "ppp mtu
> adaptive" on LNS2's vtemplate or by enabling LCP renegotiation on
> LNS2's
> vpdn-group ("lcp reneg on-mismatch"). Or set the MTU to 1492 on all
> involved vtemplates (assuming you're using this MTU on the client).
>
> oli
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list