[c-nsp] Sup32 TCAM limit

[Mark Tinka]

On Saturday 28 June 2008 06:38:46 am Gert Doering wrote:

> You could run 6PE -

I find 6PE, personally, adding complexity.

> or just route IPv6 in the core, which 
> will work fine (about 1100 IPv6 prefixes in the global
> BGP table as of these days).

Which is what I'd prefer - dual stack is simpler.

Perhaps some day, v6 will signal MPLS.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080628/4e182516/attachment.bin>