[c-nsp] 'small' MPLS?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 08:36:40AM +0000, Howard Jones wrote:
> We have an existing network of (mostly) 7206VXRs which I'd like to run 
> MPLS over if I can. Thing is, for historical reasons, there's isn't 
> really a core as such - each router is an edge to something. From my 
> reading, almost everything describes CE-PE-P routers, but are P actually 
> required? I can see that as it scales, it's the P that makes that work 
> better, but purely from the point of view of running some AToM tunnels 
> or L3VPNs over a mixed underlying network, they aren't necessary on day 
> 1 are they?

You don't need Ps :)

(I'm not exactly sure whether CE-PE-CE AToM is supported, but 
CE-PE-PE-CE AToM etc. definitely works)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080319/26123f0a/attachment.bin