[c-nsp] L3 to access layer

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 09:35:47AM -0400, Mike Johnson wrote:
> Is anyone doing layer 3 to the access layer? Problems? Cost?
> 
> I know it would be cheaper to go layer 2 to the access but I am looking for
> problems/issues tchnically that make it less attractive?

L3 is usually a LOT easier to troubleshoot ("where in the path is this 
packet loss happening?  can we please test *this* specific link for 
bit errors?").

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080321/4fa6f825/attachment-0001.bin