[c-nsp] mst & pvst
Mateusz Błaszczyk
blahu77 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 16:04:24 EDT 2008
On 25/03/2008, Adam Greene <maillist at webjogger.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm needing to set up a redundant trunk link between a 6509 and a 3750. The
> 6509 is running MST, the 3750 PVST. Am I going to have issues? I am assuming
> so ...
>
> Thanks,
> Adam
>
>
> ===
> 6509
> ===
>
> #MST (IEEE 802.1s)
> set spantree fwddelay 15 mst
> set spantree hello 2 mst
> set spantree maxage 20 mst
> set spantree mst maxhops 20
> set spantree priority 0 mst 0-15
> set spantree priority 32768 mst 16-4094
>
> #MST Configuration
> set spantree mst config rollback force
> set spantree mst config name revision 0
> set spantree mst 0 vlan 1-4094
> set spantree mst config commit
>
> #vlan(defaults)
> set spantree enable 1-16,30,40,99-100,123,128,192,840,888
> set spantree fwddelay 15 1-16,30,40,99-100,123,128,192,840,888
> set spantree hello 2 1-16,30,40,99-100,123,128,192,840,888
> set spantree maxage 20 1-16,30,40,99-100,123,128,192,840,888
> set spantree priority 32768 2-16,30,40,99-100,123,128,192,840,888
>
> ====
> 3750
> ====
>
> spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
>
>
read here
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_example09186a00807b075f.shtml#mst1
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/147.html#invalid_configuration
in a nutshell as long as mst priority for instance 0 (CST) is better
then PVST, you are good to go, but also keep in mind not to disable
PVST on any VLANs on trunks between switches (no spt-disabled point to
point vlans). Also don't do asymetric vlan configurations on trunks -
remember that mst does not care about what vlans are actually
provisioned on links but how are the instances configured.
The links should give you a good starting point
Best Regards,
-mat
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list