[c-nsp] Cisco Processing Regarding ICMP

[alaerte.vidali at nsn.com]

I am almost there concerning tolerance :) 
Hope this one is just provisory, until IP backbone devices is changed to
support necessary Jumbo frame on this customer. 
anyway I documented all risks involved, PMTU black role, Cisco CPU
increase and bla-bla-bla.

Tks,
Alaerte

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Gert Doering [mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de] 
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 9:06 PM
To: Vidali Alaerte (NSN - BR/Rio de Janeiro)
Cc: gert at greenie.muc.de; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Processing Regarding ICMP

Hi,

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:57:28PM -0500, alaerte.vidali at nsn.com wrote:
> Totally agree. Do you know that times you receive request that you 
> just would like to forget?  :)

Well... sometimes I can refuse to do things, and sometimes workarounds
can be found.

And given the number of "it must be do everything, sing and dance, and
at the same time must not cost anything" things I've had to build *and
later on support* in the past, my tolerance for crappy designs is not
overly good these days...

gert

--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
 
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025
gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de