[c-nsp] Cisco WCL- 4402 - Max AP & LAG

[Higham, Josh]

> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Cartier
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:08 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco WCL- 4402 - Max AP & LAG
> 
> I've heard somewhere...and possibly read somewhere that in 
> order to get
> the full 50 AP allotment out of a Cisco Wireless LAN Controller 4402
> model, 50 AP, you have to Port-Channel/LAG the two Gigabit ports
> together.

Not correct, to my knowledge.  We have the 4404 100 AP units and none of
our channels are bonded.

During the AP discovery process the controller assigns the AP to a given
port to maintain distribution, so I can't see any reason why it would be
necessary to have them bonded.

Thanks,
Josh