[c-nsp] DMVPN Rollout -- MTU questions

Kaj Niemi kajtzu at basen.net
Fri May 23 05:44:46 EDT 2008


Hi,

On May 22, 2008, at 21:04, Eric Cables wrote:

> I've read all of the DMVPN documentation (design guide / best  
> practices) I
> can find, along with the "Resolve IP Fragmentation, MTU, MSS, and  
> PMTUD
> Issues with GRE and IPSEC" document on cisco.com, but I'm still  
> having some
> trouble finding a systematic approach to setting MTU, and/or knowing  
> when
> the use of tcp adjust-mss is needed.
>
> Based on the DMVPN best practices design guide, we have implemented  
> the
> following:
> - IP MTU 1400
> - Tunnel PMTUD
>
> The above, however, doesn't seem to work in some cases.  Users as  
> these
> sites complain of intermittent connectivity problems, which seem to be
> solved rather quickly by reducing the IP MTU, and configuring TCP
> adjust-mss.  I do have concern as to why PTMUD isn't working as  
> expected
> (sending ICMP unreachables to the client to adjust their MTU  
> accordingly),
> and exactly what values to set both IP MTU to, as well as TCP adjust- 
> mss,
> assuming it's necessary.

My experience has been that, instead of playing with interface/server  
MTUs, simply setting ip tcp adjust-mss 1300 on any customer ingress  
interface (very, very, very conservative) resolves any issues. Most  
issues in a typical rollout seem to originate from Windows boxes and  
Windows administrators.

Are ICMP unreachables actually sent? Do they get encapsulated into a  
tunnel? Do you filter ICMP somewhere?




HTH

Kaj
-- 
Kaj J. Niemi
<kajtzu at basen.net>
+358 45 63 12000





More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list