[c-nsp] anaysis networrk

[Francois ROPERT]

More features and above all more SECURITY.
Wireshark dissectors are tested against fuzzing by Mister G. Combs and
should be by dissectors authors by running tools/fuzz-test.sh before
putting public dissectors on bugs.wireshark.org.

My advice here is to always use the last version for limiting exposure
of your computer if you don't want to get pwned by a miscreant who knows
counter forensics attack against ethereal/wireshark (intentionnaly crash
a wireshark with malicious packets to hide *FACTS* from the analyst eyes).

Francois

a. rahman isnaini r.sutan a écrit :
> Yah :)
> Wireshark more features.
> 
> Anderson Levi wrote:
>> Ethereal was renamed Wireshark sometime in '06.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:52 PM, adrian kok
>> <adriankok2000 at yahoo.com.hk>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Can I know the different between wireshark vs etheral?
>>>
>>> which one is better to anaylsis network?
>>>
>>> other than two, any suggestion
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Send instant messages to your online friends
>>> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>