[c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation

[Ruben Alvarez]

That's a great Cisco doc, thanks.  I haven't been able to find anything on
Google, but we are having issues with static IP configuration with the new
Actiontec M1000 modem firmware (v2.)  I can assign static IP addresses to
the modem via radius, but cannot with the IP unnumbered mode feature in the
Actiontec CPE.  I figured I'd give the newer IOS a try before I start
debugging PPP or radius.

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rinse Kloek [mailto:rinse.kloek at isp.solcon.nl] 
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 1:14 PM
To: Roddy Strachan
Cc: Ruben Alvarez; Cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation

What kind of features do you use with the 7206VXR box ? We are also 
looking to upgrade to 12.2.31SB13 because we have some problems with 
12.2(31)SB6.

regards Rinse

Roddy Strachan schreef:
> Ruben,
>
> Funny you mention it.
>
> I've just finished an upgrade of a mixture of 7301 and 7206vxr to
> 12.2(31)SB13.
>
> Had a 7301 running in production for 1 week, no issues, the LNS seems a
lot
> more stable if you ask me.
>
> Don't know how the 7206 will go as they have been in production less than
an
> hour :).
>
> So far so good, no real issues to report.
>
>
>
> On 7/11/08 8:03 AM, "Ruben Alvarez" <raa at opusnet.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm upgrading IOS on my c7206VXR with an npe-300 and:
>> UBR7200-I/O-2FE/E
>> PA-A3-T3=
>> PA-IMA-T1=
>> PA-4E=
>> I'm currently using 122-28.SB2 and noticed a 122-31.SB.  Is anyone using
the
>> 12.2(31)SB instead of the 12.2(28)SB?  I've been looking online and
haven't
>> seen much about it.  I assume it's got the same features as (28)?  If
anyone
>> has any feedback let me know.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>     
>
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
>  solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. 
> Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this 
> email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Please note that
>  any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
>  author and do not necessarily represent those of the organisation. 
> Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for 
> the presence of viruses. The organisation accepts no liability for any 
> damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>