[c-nsp] Recommended Cisco boxes for a small multihoming solution?

[Rodney Dunn]

I haven't looked at the price list.

How does an ASR1002 compare to a G2 combo?

>From a growth perspective the ASR1002 would be what I would
consider giving a potential migration to GigE.

Rodney

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:52:47PM +0800, raymondh (NSP) wrote:
> You may want to consider getting either part # CISCO7201 (PSU  
> included) or 7206VXR/NPE-G2 (you need to pay for the PSU, it's quite  
> cheap).
> Both the part # for the box, shouldn't be much of a difference or same.
> 
> 
> --raymondh
> 
> On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Magnus Eriksson wrote:
> 
> >I'm looking for some pointers on what are the smallest recommeded  
> >Cisco
> >boxes to use for a small multihoming solution.
> >
> >2 full BGP views (approx 260k routes each)
> >100 Mbps bandwidth requirement.
> >
> >The setup currently uses 2 Juniper M5 but those are in dire need of  
> >refresh.
> >
> >
> >What is the appropiate Cisco boxes to go for? Do I need any memory  
> >upgrades
> >etc?
> >
> >Any suggestions are welcome.
> >
> >Regards Magnus
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/