[c-nsp] Alternatives to Cisco's TACACS server?

[Yuval Ben Ari]

Hi Tom,

You did not mention your requirements like does it need to be GUI based or
is conf file based is ok (tac_plus)?
Also what is the reason you want to abandon the ACS?
I'm asking because we actually migrated from tac_plus to ACS due to the
improved management capabilities via GUI.
I think there are actually not a lot of alternatives around.

Yuval


On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Tom Simes <simestd at netexpress.com> wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
> We've got an aging Cisco Secure ACS install on the Windows platform
> and we're looking for alternatives.  We're only using TACACS+ for admin
> authentication into our Cisco gear (not RADIUS), but we do have a
> variety of groups defined with differing access to commands and
> equipment and our user store is LDAP so we need at least that level of
> functionality.
>
> What are folks using these days for a TACACS+ server that they're happy
> with?
> TIA!
>
> Tom
>
> ======================================================================
>   "Z-80 system stack overflow.  Shut 'er down Scotty, the system's
>         sucking mud" - Error message on TRS 80 Model-16B
>
> Tom Simes                                       simestd at netexpress.com
> ======================================================================
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>